Volume 34, Issue 4 (Winter 2022)
JMDP 2022, 34(4): 91-118 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aliabadian A, Khamseh A, Zamani Moghadam A, Hosseini Shakib M. A System Model of Value Acquisition Based on Innovative Economics in Knowledge-Based Businesses in the Field of Information Technology. JMDP 2022; 34 (4) :91-118
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4323-en.html
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4323-en.html
1- Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Industrial Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. , Abbas.khamseh@kiau.ac.ir
3- Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Industrial Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Industrial Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. , Abbas.khamseh@kiau.ac.ir
3- Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Industrial Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
Abstract: (5337 Views)
Purpose: This study aims to present a systems model of Value Acquisition based on innovation economics in knowledge-based businesses in the field of information technology.
Methodology: Beside the review of Literature, in order to further enrich the data gathering process, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 experts in the field of information technology and consequently the most important dimensions and components were identified. Then, a questionnaire was designed and made available to 103 specialists and managers of knowledge-based businesses in the field of information technology. Adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was used to validate the predicted model.
Findings: Results show that the most important dimensions affecting value acquisition based on innovation economics in knowledge-based businesses in IT domain fall into the following order of importance: business and market, innovation economics, value acquisition, information technology resources, information technology, innovation in information technology, security and law. Also, due to the amount of errors observed and the lack of meta-adaptation phenomenon in the designed ANFIS, the model has acceptable validity and high predictive power.
Originality: Presenting a systems model which includes the most important dimensions and components of value acquisition based on innovation economics, this research can help policy makers and managers involved in knowledge-based businesses in the field of information technology.
Methodology: Beside the review of Literature, in order to further enrich the data gathering process, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 experts in the field of information technology and consequently the most important dimensions and components were identified. Then, a questionnaire was designed and made available to 103 specialists and managers of knowledge-based businesses in the field of information technology. Adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was used to validate the predicted model.
Findings: Results show that the most important dimensions affecting value acquisition based on innovation economics in knowledge-based businesses in IT domain fall into the following order of importance: business and market, innovation economics, value acquisition, information technology resources, information technology, innovation in information technology, security and law. Also, due to the amount of errors observed and the lack of meta-adaptation phenomenon in the designed ANFIS, the model has acceptable validity and high predictive power.
Originality: Presenting a systems model which includes the most important dimensions and components of value acquisition based on innovation economics, this research can help policy makers and managers involved in knowledge-based businesses in the field of information technology.
Keywords: Value Acquisition, Innovation Economics, Knowledge-Based Businesses, Information Technology, Systems Model.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: Oct 09 2021 | Accepted: Apr 30 2022 | ePublished: Jul 06 2022
Received: Oct 09 2021 | Accepted: Apr 30 2022 | ePublished: Jul 06 2022
References
1. AbdEllatif, M., Farhan, M. S., & Shehata, N. S. (2018). Overcoming Business Process Reengineering Obstacles Using Ontology-Based Knowledge Map Methodology. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 3(1), 7-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcij.2017.10.006.]
2. Alinejad, A. H., Azar, A., & PourZarandi, M. (2020). Designing a Model for Predicting and Evaluating the Innovation Capacity of Knowledge-Based Companies with a Neural-Adaptive Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). Management Researches, 13(47), 55-84. [https://dx.doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2019.24774.3923.]
3. Arabi, A., Sharifzadeh, M. S., & Gorji, M. B. (2021). Identification and Evaluation of Knowledge Commercialization Indicators with an International Approach in Knowledge-Based Companies in Tehran. Journal of Business Management, 13(49), 432-448. [http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_681335.html]
4. ASIST (2020). The Association for Information Science and Technology. [https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/23301643]
5. Azimzadeh, A., Sanaeepour, H., Ashrafi, M., & Shojaei, S. (2021). Presenting a Structural Equation Model for International Entrepreneurship Development in Iranian Knowledge-Based Businesses. Journal of Business Management, 13(50), 150-172. [http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_683085.html]
6. Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H., Wojcak, E., & Polakova, M. (2014). Dynamics of Changes toward Knowledge-Based Economy in Slovak SMEs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150(1), 637-647. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.083.]
7. Banda, G., Tait, J., & Mittra, J. (2018). Evolution of Business Models in Regenerative Medicine: Effects of a Disruptive Innovation on the Innovation Ecosystem. Clinical Therapeutics, 40(7), 1084-1094. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.06.003.] [PMID]
8. Bandarian, R., Bonyadi Naieni, A., & Amirghodsi, S. (2020). The Comparative Study of Business Environment of International Oil Companies And National Oil Companies, and Proposing Some Policy Solutions for Enhancing the Competitive Advantages of These Companies. Journal of Researches Energy Law Studies, 6(1), 39-58. [https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jrels.2020.290663.320]
9. Boroumand, M., & Ranjbari, M. (2009). Human Resources Management Strategic Initiatives and Initiative Performance: Emphasizing the Role of Knowledge Management. Journal of Police Organizational Development, 6(24), 41-54. [http://pod.jrl.police.ir/article_9415.html]
10. Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A. (2019). Incumbents and Business Model Innovation for the Sharing Economy: Implications for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214(1), 995-1010. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.295.]
11. Fallah Tafti, S., Jahani, M., & Emami, S. A. (2012). Explaining Evolutionary Trend of Strategic Planning from Traditional Economy to Innovation Economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58(1), 56-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.978.]
12. Feizi, K., Taqavi Fard, M. T., Vanani, I. R., & Mahmoudsalehi, M. (2018). Information Technology Business Value Measurement Framework. Public Management Researches, 10(38), 35-62. [https://dx.doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2018.3716]
13. Ghasemi, M., Faghihi, M., & Alizadeh, P. (2018). Requirements to Achieve a Knowledge-Based Economy at Macro Level: Analysis of Legal Framework in Iran and Some Policy Recommendations. Economics Research, 18(68), 99-152. [https://dx.doi.org/10.22054/joer.2018.8689]
14. Heydari, S., Hosseini Shakib, M., & Khamseh, A. (2020). IT-Business Strategic Alignment and Organizational Agility: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty. Journal of System Management, 6(1), 35-52.
15. Hsu, T.-H., & Tang, J.-W. (2020). Development of Hierarchical Structure and Analytical Model of Key Factors for Mobile App Stickiness. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(1), 68-79. [DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2019.01.006.]
16. Iheanachor, N., David-West, Y., & Umukoro, I. O. (2021). Business Model Innovation at the Bottom of the Pyramid-A Case of Mobile Money Agents. Journal of Business Research, 127(1), 96-107. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.029.] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Jafar, A., Akbari, M., & Davari, A. (2020). The Effective Factors on the Formation of Innovation Clusters: The Case of Sharif Innovation District. Journal of Sciene and Technology Policy, 12(1), 1-14. [http://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13778.html]
18. Kargar, H., & Ghadami, M. (2019). Designing an Econometric Innovation Model Based on the Main Dimensions of Strategy in Iranian Governmental Organizations (Case Study: The State Organization for Registration of Deeds and Properties). Journal of Investment Knowledge, 8(29), 333-354. [http://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_13910.html]
19. Khamseh, A., & Vosough Rohani, M. (2018). Analysis and Assessment of Innovation Management with Structural Equation Modeling Approach in Golestan Company. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 16(31), 13-22. [http://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_27139.html]
20. Khatib, M., Mohaghegh Nia, M. J., Sadeghi Shahdani, M., & Sargolzaei, M. (2021). Identifying the Effective Factors on the Investment in the Growth Stage of Knowledge-Based Companies' Technological Projects in Banking System. Journal of Business Management, 13(50), 239-255. [http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_683090.html]
21. Khorakian, A., Jahangir Feyzabadi, M., foroutan, M., & dehghan banadaki, M. (2015). The Impact of Knowledge Management on Innovation through Moderating Organizational Factors of Human Resources and Technology in Knowledge-Based Companies. Journal of Management and Development Process, 28(2), 75-107. [http://jmdp.ir/article-1-1379-fa.html]
22. Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital Servitization Business Models in Ecosystems: A Theory of the Firm. Journal of Business Research, 104(1), 380-392. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027.]
23. Kojouri, H., Mirabi, V., & Safarzadeh, H. (2021). Designing and Optimizing the Value Creation Model for Bank Customers in the Process of Creating a Common Brand Value. Journal of Business Management, 13(49), 202-226. [http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_681252.html]
24. Medase, S. K., & Abdul-Basit, S. (2020). External Knowledge Modes and Firm-Level Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 81-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.001.]
25. Mehrabani, F., Ghobadi, S., & Rezaeeyan, A. (2014). Investigation of the Mutual Effect of Knowledge-Based Economy and TFP and Their Relationship: Case Study on Developed, Emerging and Developing Countries. Iran's Economic Essays, 11(21), 125-160. http://iee.rihu.ac.ir/article_523.html.
26. Min, J.-W., Vonortas, N. S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Commercialization of Transferred Public Technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138(1), 10-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.003.]
27. Modesti, P. (2020). Integrating Formal Methods for Security in Software Security Education. Informatics in Education-An International Journal, 19(3), 425-454.
https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.19 [DOI:10.15388/infedu.2020.19.]
28. Moradian, M., & Hosseini Shakib, M. (2018). Evaluation of Innovation Management Performance and Ranking the Effective Factors Using Analytic Network Process in Mavad Karan Mapna Co. Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 16(31), 5-12. [http://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_26546.html]
29. Mortazavi, S. H., & Bahrami, M. (2012). Integrated Approach to Entrepreneurship-Knowledge Based Economy: A Conceptual Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41(1), 281-287. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.032.]
30. Norouzi, H., Kanani Tehrani, S., & Darvish, F. (2021). The Effect of Innovation Capability and Organization Marketing Capacity on Export Marketing Performance. Journal of Business Management, 13(50), 579-596. [http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_683104.html]
31. Paiola, M., & Gebauer, H. (2020). Internet of Things Technologies, Digital Servitization and Business Model Innovation in BtoB Manufacturing Firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 89(1), 245-264. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.009.]
32. Ritala, P., & Stefan, I. (2021). A Paradox within the Paradox of Openness: The Knowledge Leveraging Conundrum in Open Innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 93(1), 281-292. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.01.011.]
33. Rizvandi, M. A., Sahabi, B., Yavari, K., & Momeni, F. (2017). A Critical Assessment of Neoclassical Economics in the Problem of Transition to the Knowledge-Based Economy: An Institutional Approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 10(1), 17-29. [http://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12971.html]
34. Russell, M. G., & Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2018). Leveraging Complexity for Ecosystemic Innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(1), 114-131. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024.]
35. Sagieva, R. K., & Zhuparova, A. S. (2012). Management of Innovation Processes in Terms of Development of National Economy of Kazakhstan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(1), 88-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.096.]
36. Samadi Moghadam, Y., Hashemzadeh Khorasgani, G., Radfar, R., & Manteghi, M. (2017). Investigating the Importance of R & D Capacity Factors on Technology Transfer Techniques (Case Study: Iranian Automotive Industry). Journal of Investment Knowledge, 6(22), 101-112. [http://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_10787.html]
37. Shirin, A., Foroozandeh, L., Danaee fard, H., & Khaef Elahi, A. A. (2017). Evaluation of the Path-Structural Model of Human Resources Empowerment Knowledge Base. Journal of Management and Development Process, 30(3), 3-30. [http://jmdp.ir/article-1-2862-fa.html]
38. Shujahat, M., Sousa, M. J., Hussain, S., Nawaz, F., Wang, M., & Umer, M. (2019). Translating the Impact of Knowledge Management Processes into Knowledge-Based Innovation: The Neglected and Mediating Role of Knowledge-Worker Productivity. Journal of Business Research, 94(1), 442-450. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.001.]
39. Širá, E., Vavrek, R., Kravčáková Vozárová, I., & Kotulič, R. (2020). Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable Competitiveness of the EU Countries. Sustainability, 12(10), 4172. [DOI:10.3390/su12104172.]
40. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Tou, Y., Watanabe, C., Moriya, K., Naveed, N., Vurpillat, V., & Neittaanmäki, P. (2019). The Transformation of R&D into Neo Open Innovation-A New Concept in R&D Endeavor Triggered by Amazon. Technology in Society, 58(1), 101141. [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.05.005.]
42. Von Delft, S., Kortmann, S., Gelhard, C., & Pisani, N. (2019). Leveraging Global Sources of Knowledge for Business Model Innovation. Long Range Planning, 52(5), 101848. [DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.08.003.]
43. Yahiaei, M., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2018). Presentation a Technology Commercialization Model in ICT Knowledge Base Companies. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 7(26), 63-82. [http://jik.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12601.html]
44. Zamani Maghadam, A., Taghipour Zahir, A., & Dadgarpanah, Z. (2019). Providing a Development Model of the Empowerment of Graduated Students of the Islamic Azad University, Considering the Fundamental Changes in the Higher Education System in the Future. Future Study Management, 30(118), 221-238. [http://jmfr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_15309.html]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
