Volume 33, Issue 3 (Autumn 2020)
JMDP 2020, 33(3): 95-128 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Banasadegh Z, Zahedi S, Gholamali Farjadi G. A Model for Development Planning Process Based on the Sustainable Development Approach in the Iranian Oil Industry. JMDP 2020; 33 (3) :95-128
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3772-en.html
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3772-en.html
1- Ph.D Student of Public Administration, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran.
2- Professor Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. , szahedi@atu.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Economics, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran.
2- Professor Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. , szahedi@atu.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Economics, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (4121 Views)
The complexity and extent of sustainable development concept calls for the capability to apply planning tools to introduce optimal relationship among all aspects of development and to materialize all principles of sustainability. Related literature and sustainable development processes in some countries, as well as 30 companies affiliated to the Iranian Oil Industry, which were all practicing sustainable development approach, were studied to reach a model for sustainable development. Results show that the outcomes of the six main steps or processes (starting with the stage of planning, stakeholders’ participation, preparing planning draft, formulating the vision, preparing outcomes framework, and planning for implementation), as well as fourteen secondary steps and processes (creating the core of planning, preparing the schedule, preparing instructions, assigning planning stakeholders, identifying problems on the basis of geographical regions, identifying problems related to sustainable development, assigning sustainable development stakeholders, identifying problem solving resources, formulating the vision, setting objectives, determining outcomes, formulating indexes, determining implementation resources, and designating responsibilities) are at a favorable level. However, only the two secondary processes of formulating indexes and designating administrative responsibilities need improvement.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Public Administration
Received: Dec 07 2019 | Accepted: Apr 12 2020 | ePublished: Mar 01 2021
Received: Dec 07 2019 | Accepted: Apr 12 2020 | ePublished: Mar 01 2021
References
1. Bartle, J. R., & Leuenberger, D. (2006). The Idea of Sustainable Development in Public Administration: Sage Publications A: Thousand Oaks, CA. [DOI:10.1177/1087724X06287507]
2. Boulanger, P.-M., & Bréchet, T. (2005). Models for Policy-Making in Sustainable Development: The State of the Art and Perspectives for Research. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 337-350. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.033]
3. Brodhag, C., & Talière, S. (2006). Sustainable Development Strategies: Tools for Policy Coherence. Paper Presented at the Natural Resources Forum. [DOI:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00166.x]
4. Dernbach, J. C. (1998). Sustainable Development as a Framework for National Governance. Case Western Reserve Law, 49, 1.
5. Dernbach, J. C. (2003). Achieving Sustainable Development: The Centrality and Multiple Facets of Integrated Decision Making. Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 247-284. [DOI:10.2979/gls.2003.10.1.247]
6. Elliott, J. (2012). An Introduction to Sustainable Development: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203844175]
7. Emas, R. (2015). The Concept of Sustainable Development: Definition and Defining Principles. Brief for GSDR, 2015.
8. Faucheux, S., Pearce, D., & Proops, J. (1996). Models of Sustainable Development Edward Elgar: London.
9. Furtado, J. I. d. R., Belt, T., & Jammi, R. (2000). Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability: Policies and Principles for a Durable Equilibrium: The World Bank. [DOI:10.1596/0-8213-4573-7]
10. Gills, B. K. (2002). Democratizing Globalization and Globalizing Democracy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 581(1), 158-171. [DOI:10.1177/000271620258100114]
11. Heady, F. (2001). Public Administration, a Comparative Perspective: CRC Press. [DOI:10.4324/9781420029482]
12. Hellström, D., Jeppsson, U., & Kärrman, E. (2000). A Framework for Systems Analysis of Sustainable Urban Water Management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 311-321. [DOI:10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00043-3]
13. Hrebik, S., Trebicky, V., & Gremlika, T. (2006). Manual for Planning and Evaluation of SD at the Regional Level. Office of the Government of the Czech Republic.
14. Hughes, O. E. (2012). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction: Macmillan International Higher Education. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-137-00305-8_4]
15. Imperatives, S. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Accessed Feb, 10.
16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge University Press.
17. Karlsson, S. (1999). Closing the Technospheric Flows of Toxic Metals: Modeling Lead Losses from a Lead-Acid Battery System for Sweden. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(1), 23-40. [DOI:10.1162/108819899569377]
18. Kirkpatrick, C., George, C., & Curran, J. (2001). Development of Criteria to Assess the Efectiveness of National Strategies for Sustainable Development. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
19. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
20. Levings, C. D. (2004). Knowledge of Fish Ecology and Its Application to Habitat Management. Fraser River Delta, British Columbia: Issues of an Urban Estuary, Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 567(1), 213-236. [DOI:10.4095/215810]
21. Litfin, K. (1994). Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation: Columbia University Press.
22. Marinova, D., & McGrath, N. (2005) Transdisciplinarity in Teaching and Learning Sustainability, in Banse, G., Hronszky, I., and Nelson, G. (eds), Rationality in an Uncertain World, 275-285, Edition Sigma, Berlin. [DOI:10.5771/9783845271224-275]
23. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. New York, 102(1972), 27. [DOI:10.4324/9780429322204-3]
24. Pearce, J. A., Freeman, E. B., & Robinson Jr, R. B. (1987). The Tenuous Link between Formal Strategic Planning and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 658-675. [DOI:10.2307/258071]
25. Rao, P. (2000). Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy: Malden, Oxford.
26. Redclift, M. (2002). Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203408889]
27. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students: Pearson Education.
28. Scriven, M. (1974). Evaluation Perspectives and Procedures. In Evaluation in Education, Popham, W. J., McCutchan Publishing Corp., 2526.
29. Speth, J. G. (2004). Red Sky at Morning: America and the Crisis of the Global Environment: Yale University Press.
30. State of Qatar (2014). National Development Planning and Implementation Human Development, Sustainable Development and National Well-being, New York. [https://www.un.org.]
31. Stillman, R. (2009). Public Administration: Concepts and Cases: Nelson Education.
32. Stoddart, H. (2011). A Pocket Guide to Sustainable Development Governance. Stakeholder Forum. Paper Presented at the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rio de Janiero, Brazil: United Nations.
33. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The Use of Experimental Design in Educational Evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(4), 267-274. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00936.x]
34. Todorov, V., & Marinova, D. (2009). Models of Sustainability. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of MODSIM 2009 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.
35. Turco, R. P., Toon, O. B., Ackerman, T. P., Pollack, J. B., & Sagan, C. (1983).
36. Nuclear Winter: Global Consequences of Multiple Nuclear Explosions. Science, 222(4630), 1283-1292. [DOI:10.1126/science.222.4630.1283]
37. Tyler, R. W. (1942). General Statement on Evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research, 35(7), 492-501. [DOI:10.1080/00220671.1942.10881106]
38. UN (2001). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies: United Nations Publications.
39. UNDP (2011). The Evaluation Policy of UNDP. [http://www.undp.org/eo/documents/Evaluation-Policy.pdf]
40. UNDP (2009). Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation for Development Results. [http://web.undp.org/evaluation/handbook/get_handbook.html]
41. Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines: Longman Pub Group.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
