Volume 35, Issue 2 (summer 2022)
JMDP 2022, 35(2): 107-130 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Beikzad J, Jalilinezhad G. (2022). A Model for the Impact of E-Government’s Readiness and Trust on Quality of Services with the Mediating Role of E-Government Acceptance. JMDP. 35(2), 107-130. doi:10.52547/jmdp.35.2.107
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4431-en.html
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4431-en.html
1- Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Human Resource, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran. , Beikzad.jafar@bonabiau.ac.ir
2- Department of Public Administration, , Faculty of Human Resource, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.
2- Department of Public Administration, , Faculty of Human Resource, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.
Abstract: (1852 Views)
Purpose: The aim of this study was to present a model for the impact of e-government’s readiness and trust on quality of services with regard to the mediating role of e-government acceptance from the view point of IT managers and experts of West Azerbaijan agencies.
Methodology: The present study was applied in terms of type and descriptive-correlational in terms of method. The statistical population consisted of 314 IT managers and experts of West Azerbaijan Province agencies. Applying stratified random sampling method and Cochran’s formula, 173 individuals were selected. Data were collected by administering questionnaires and were tested using SMART PLS software as well as structural equation modeling to reach the casual model.
Findings: The results of the study show that the following impacts are positive and significant: e-government readiness on e-government acceptance, e-government trust on e-government acceptance, e-government acceptance on quality of e-services, e-government readiness on quality of e-services, and e-government trust on quality of e-services. In addition, e-government acceptance plays a mediating role in the relation between e-government readiness and trust, on the one hand, and quality of e-services, on the other.
Methodology: The present study was applied in terms of type and descriptive-correlational in terms of method. The statistical population consisted of 314 IT managers and experts of West Azerbaijan Province agencies. Applying stratified random sampling method and Cochran’s formula, 173 individuals were selected. Data were collected by administering questionnaires and were tested using SMART PLS software as well as structural equation modeling to reach the casual model.
Findings: The results of the study show that the following impacts are positive and significant: e-government readiness on e-government acceptance, e-government trust on e-government acceptance, e-government acceptance on quality of e-services, e-government readiness on quality of e-services, and e-government trust on quality of e-services. In addition, e-government acceptance plays a mediating role in the relation between e-government readiness and trust, on the one hand, and quality of e-services, on the other.
Keywords: E-Government Readiness, Quality of E-Services, E-Government Acceptance, E-Government Trust, Information Technology Unit of State Agencies.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: Mar 05 2022 | Accepted: Oct 16 2022 | ePublished: Jan 02 2023
Received: Mar 05 2022 | Accepted: Oct 16 2022 | ePublished: Jan 02 2023
References
1. Aghighi, A., & Rostami, R. (2018). Evaluating the Effect of E-Government Quality on Public Participation, Considering the Intermediate Role of Public Trust. Police Cultural Studies, 5(2), 1-21. [http://hamedan.jrl.police.ir/article_91464.html] [DOI:10.5296/jsss.v5i2.12721]
2. Bahadori, Y., Salajeghe, S., Mahdizadeh, S., & Nikpour, A. (2020). Investigating the Role of E-Government in the Implementation of Quality Oil Export Policies of the Ministry of Oil of the Islamic Republic of Iran by Providing an Optimal Model. Political Science Quarterly, 16(52), 73-96. [http://psq.kiau.ac.ir/article_677574.html]
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173] [PMID]
4. Behboudi, M., Ahmadi Kahneali, R., & Ghasemi, A. (2019). Identifying the Causes of E-Government Development Plan Failure in Iran from Authorities and Citizens Perspectives and Providing Solutions for Its Success. (Qualitative Study in Hormozgan Province). Science and Technology Policy Letters, 09(1), 45-58. [http://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/article_21436.html]
5. Beikzad, J., Molavi, Z., & Esgandari, K. (2011). Relationship between the Quality of Electronic Services and Students' Electronic Satisfaction in Islamic Azad University of Bonab. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(3), 67-92. [http://ictedu.iausari.ac.ir/article_631358.html]
6. Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E. (2021). The Role of Digital Innovation in Knowledge Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Business Research, 123(1), 220-231. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042]
7. Ebrahimi, K., Azar, A., & Chitsazian, A. (2020). Designing a Model for Measuring E-Government Service Quality - The Case of Governmental Kiosks. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 89-109. [DOI:10.22108/jpom.2020.121911.1250]
8. Haydari, S., & Montazer, G. (2020). Assessing E-Government Readiness in Iranian Universities, Case Study: Tarbiat Modares University. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 12(43), 1-26. [https://rimag.ricest.ac.ir/en/Article/8703]
9. Khormali, A., Moazzami, M., & Faramarziplangar, M. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between Electronic Service Quality and Customer Confidence in Using Tourism Bank Online Services (Example: Tehran City). Journal of Business Management, 11(44), 109-130. [http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_670265.html]
10. Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G., & Paçin, Y. (2017). Adoption of E-Government Services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041]
11. Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Citizens' Continuous-Use Intention Regarding E-Government: Empirical Evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197. [DOI:10.1016/j.im.2019.103197]
12. Pouti, N. (2018). A Comprehensive Review of E-Government Readiness Assessment Models and Providing a Methodology for Assessing E-Government Readiness in Governorate Analysis Level. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 3(2), 139-168. [http://www.aimj.ir/article_69409.html]
13. Sánchez-Torres, J. M., & Miles, I. (2017). The Role of Future-Oriented Technology Analysis in E-Government: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1), 1-18. [DOI:10.1007/s40309-017-0131-7]
14. Sargazi, Z., & Rahnavard Ahan, F. (2021). The Impact of Social Capital, Information and Communication Technology Development, and Globalization on Good Urban Governance Based on the Participation Culture and Local Authorities' Inclination Approach. Management and Development Process, 34(1), 3-26. [http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3687-fa.html] [DOI:10.52547/jmdp.34.1.3]
15. Sarlak, M. A., Golpayegani, Z., & Yamani, M. (2015). A Survey of Factors Affecting the Acceptance of E-Government among the Clients of the Justice Dept. of Tehran Province Base on DTPB Model - Casa Study: The CMS of Shahid Beheshti Complex. Management and Development Process, 27(1), 27-54. [http://jmdp.ir/article-1-1972-fa.html]
16. Shareef, M., Ojo, A., & Janowski, T. (2008). A Readiness Assessment Framework for E-Government Planning: Design and Application. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd international Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. [DOI:10.1145/1509096.1509180]
17. Taghavifard, M. T., Ghorbanizadeh, V., & Hejazinia, R. (2020). A Pattern for the Requirements of Establishing Government Services in the Context of Social Media: E-Government 2.0. Public Management Researches, 12(46), 149-170. [https://dx.doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2020.31326.4741]
18. Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What Determines Success of an E-Government Service? Validation of an Integrative Model of E-Filing Continuance Usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161-174. [DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004]
19. Wang, T., Vonk, J., & Grefen, P. (2008). Towards a Contractual Approach for Transaction Management. Enterprise Information Systems, 2(4), 443-458. [DOI:10.1080/17517570802337362]
20. Yaghoubi, N.-M., & Rigi, F. (2017). Analysis of E-Service Quality from the Management Perspective: An Empirical Study on E-Government Services. International Journal of Business Excellence, 11(1), 58-71. [DOI:10.1504/IJBEX.2017.080605]
21. Zheng, L., & Jiang, Y. (2011). Assessing E-Government Readiness of Local Governments in China: Developing a Bottom-Up Approach. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. [DOI:10.1145/2072069.2072085]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
