1- گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران. ، s.rahimi@tabrizu.ac.ir
2- گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.
3- گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، پژوهشگر و مدرس دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.
2- گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.
3- گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، پژوهشگر و مدرس دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.
چکیده: (705 مشاهده)
هدف: در شرایط رقابت فزاینده و محدودیت منابع، بازترکیب منابع بهعنوان رویکردی خلاقانه برای بهرهبرداری بهینه از ظرفیتهای موجود میتواند به تقویت کارآفرینی سازمانی منجر شود. هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر بازترکیب منابع بر کارآفرینی سازمانی با نقش میانجی تشخیص فرصت و نقش تعدیلگر جهتگیری یادگیری در شرکتهای تولیدی استان آذربایجان شرقی است.
روششناسی (رویکرد): این پژوهش ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر ماهیت توصیفی-پیمایشی و همبستگی است. جامعه آماری شامل مدیران و کارشناسان شرکتهای فعال در صنایع غذایی، دارویی و بهداشتی استان آذربایجان شرقی (۷۵۰ شرکت) است که از میان آنها ۲۵۴ نفر با استفاده از فرمول کوکران انتخاب شدند. دادهها با بهرهگیری از پرسشنامه و با استفاده از نرمافزارهای اسپیاساس نسخه ۲۵ و اسمارت پیالاس نسخه ۳ تحلیل شد.
یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد بازترکیب منابع تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر تشخیص فرصت دارد و تشخیص فرصت نیز بر کارآفرینی سازمانی اثرگذار است. نقش میانجی تشخیص فرصت تأیید شد؛ اما نقش تعدیلگر جهتگیری یادگیری معنادار نبود.
اصالت پژوهش: این مطالعه با بررسی همزمان بازترکیب منابع، تشخیص فرصت و جهتگیری یادگیری در بستر صنایع تولیدی ایران، به توسعه ادبیات کارآفرینی سازمانی کمک میکند.
نتیجهگیری: نتایج این پژوهش بر اهمیت تأثیر بازترکیب منابع بر کارآفرینی سازمانی شرکتهای تولیدکننده فعال در صنعت مواد غذایی، دارویی و بهداشتی استان آذربایجان شرقی تأکید دارد و میتواند راهنمای کاربردی برای مدیران در جهت توسعه ظرفیتهای نوآورانه باشد.
روششناسی (رویکرد): این پژوهش ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر ماهیت توصیفی-پیمایشی و همبستگی است. جامعه آماری شامل مدیران و کارشناسان شرکتهای فعال در صنایع غذایی، دارویی و بهداشتی استان آذربایجان شرقی (۷۵۰ شرکت) است که از میان آنها ۲۵۴ نفر با استفاده از فرمول کوکران انتخاب شدند. دادهها با بهرهگیری از پرسشنامه و با استفاده از نرمافزارهای اسپیاساس نسخه ۲۵ و اسمارت پیالاس نسخه ۳ تحلیل شد.
یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد بازترکیب منابع تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر تشخیص فرصت دارد و تشخیص فرصت نیز بر کارآفرینی سازمانی اثرگذار است. نقش میانجی تشخیص فرصت تأیید شد؛ اما نقش تعدیلگر جهتگیری یادگیری معنادار نبود.
اصالت پژوهش: این مطالعه با بررسی همزمان بازترکیب منابع، تشخیص فرصت و جهتگیری یادگیری در بستر صنایع تولیدی ایران، به توسعه ادبیات کارآفرینی سازمانی کمک میکند.
نتیجهگیری: نتایج این پژوهش بر اهمیت تأثیر بازترکیب منابع بر کارآفرینی سازمانی شرکتهای تولیدکننده فعال در صنعت مواد غذایی، دارویی و بهداشتی استان آذربایجان شرقی تأکید دارد و میتواند راهنمای کاربردی برای مدیران در جهت توسعه ظرفیتهای نوآورانه باشد.
واژههای کلیدی: بازترکیب منابع، کارآفرینی سازمانی، تشخیص فرصت، جهتگیری یادگیری، توسعه صنایع، توسعه فرصتهای کارآفرینی، مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری.
فهرست منابع
1. Abdi Jamyran, A. Hosseini, E. & Revai, S. (2017). Examining Opportunity Identification Models in the Entrepreneurship Process, Research in the Arts and Humanities, 3 (5), 79-88. (In Persian).
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. [DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T]
3. Akbari, M. & Danesh, M. (2019). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 50(4), 789-801. (In persian)
4. Akbari, M., Sakhdari, K., & Danesh, M. (2020). Organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship and performance in Iranian food industry. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 22(2), 361-375.
5. Aliabadian, A., Khamseh, A., Zamani Moghadam, A., & Hosseini Shakib, M. (2022). A system model of value acquisition based on innovative economics in knowledge-based businesses in the field of information technology. Journal of Management and Development Process (JMDP), 34(4), 91-118. (In Persian) [DOI:10.52547/jmdp.34.4.91]
6. Alva, E., Vivas, V., & Urcia, M. (2023). Entrepreneurial bricolage: crowdfunding for female entrepreneurs during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(4), 677-697. [DOI:10.1108/JEEE-12-2020-0464]
7. An, W., Zhao, X., Cao, Z., Zhang, J., & Liu, H. (2018). How bricolage drives corporate entrepreneurship:The roles of opportunity identification and learning orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 49-65. [DOI:10.1111/jpim.12377]
8. Bai, W., Holmström Lind, C., & Johanson, M. (2016). The performance of international returnee ventures: the role of networking capability and the usefulness of international business knowledge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9-10), 657-680. [DOI:10.1080/08985626.2016.1234003]
9. Baker, T. (2007). Resources in play: Bricolage in the Toy Store (y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 694-711. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.008]
10. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 329-366. [DOI:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329]
11. Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research policy, 32(2), 255-276. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00099-9]
12. Baker, T., Pollock, T. G., & Sapienza, H. J. (2013). Winning an unfair game: How a resource-constrained player uses bricolage to maneuver for advantage in a highly institutionalized field. In Entrepreneurial Resourcefulness: Competing With Constraints (pp. 1-41). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [DOI:10.1108/S1074-7540(2013)0000015004]
13. Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs "connect the dots" to identify new business opportunities. Academy of management perspectives, 20(1), 104-119. [DOI:10.5465/amp.2006.19873412]
14. Bloodgood, J. M., Hornsby, J. S., Burkemper, A. C., & Sarooghi, H. (2015). A system dynamics perspective of corporate entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 383-402. [DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9634-4]
15. Bojica, A. M., Ruiz Jiménez, J. M., Ruiz Nava, J. A., & Fuentes-Fuentes, M. M. (2018). Bricolage and growth in social entrepreneurship organizations. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 362-389. [DOI:10.1080/08985626.2017.1413768]
16. Boxenbaum, E., & Rouleau, L. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 272-296. [DOI:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330898]
17. Burgelman, R. A. (1984). Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms. California management review, 26(3), 154-166. [DOI:10.2307/41165086]
18. Burgers, H., Stuetzer, M., & Senyard, J. M. (2014). Antecedents, consequences, and the mediating role of bricolage in corporate entrepreneurship. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 13473). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. [DOI:10.5465/ambpp.2014.13473abstract]
19. Ciambotti, G., Sgrò, F., Bontis, N., & Zaccone, M. C. (2021). Local relationships matter! The impact of intellectual capital on entrepreneurial bricolage in African social entrepreneurs. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(4), 321-330. [DOI:10.1002/kpm.1678]
20. Cunha, M. P. E., Rego, A., Oliveira, P., Rosado, P., & Habib, N. (2014). Product innovation in resource‐poor environments: Three research streams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 202-210. [DOI:10.1111/jpim.12090]
21. Desa, G. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 36(4), 727-751. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x]
22. Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26-49. [DOI:10.1002/sej.1150]
23. Dianti, M., Karimi, A., & Akbari, M. (2018). The impact of entrepreneurial self-efficacy on the recognition of opportunities with respect to the passion of entrepreneurship, Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 11 (1), 61-80. (In Persian).
24. Ding, Z., Ye, G., Huang, S., & Hu, M. (2022). How learning orientation drives the international performance of INVs: the roles of entrepreneurial bricolage and degree of internationalization. Multinational Business Review, 30(2), 192-216. [DOI:10.1108/MBR-07-2020-0155]
25. Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C. C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133-151. [DOI:10.1177/0170840609347051]
26. Esfahani, A. N., Ansari, R. R., & Molayi Khorasagani, R. R. (2016). The impact of knowledge absorption capacity on organizational entrepreneurship (A case study of companies located in Isfahan Science and Technology Town). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 9(2), 377-395.
27. Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource‐based view: toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 73-94. [DOI:10.1002/sej.41]
28. Gao, G. Y., Xie, E., & Zhou, K. Z. (2015). How does technological diversity in supplier network drive buyer innovation? Relational process and contingencies. Journal of Operations Management, 36, 165-177. [DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.001]
29. Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research policy, 32(2), 277-300. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2]
30. George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350. [DOI:10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y]
31. Gruber, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Thompson, J. D. (2012). From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1421-1449. [DOI:10.1177/0149206310386228]
32. Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 743-784. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01045.x]
33. Hassani, Mohammad, Bahadori, Rogayeh, & Kazemzadeh Beyali, Mehdi. (2016). Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Identity with Organizational Entrepreneurship among the Faculty Members of Tabriz University. Journal of entrepreneurship development, 9(3), 433-45. (In Persian)
34. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication monographs, 85(1), 4-40. [DOI:10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100]
35. Hodgetts, R. M., & Kuratko, D. F. (2001). Entrepreneurship: A contemporary approach. South-Western/Thomson Learning.
36. Hooi, H. C., Ahmad, N. H., Amran, A., & Rahman, S. A. (2016). The functional role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage in ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship. Management research review, 39(12), 1616-1638. [DOI:10.1108/MRR-06-2015-0144]
37. Hoskisson, R. E., Covin, J., Volberda, H. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: The search for new research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1141-1168. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00997.x]
38. Hota, P. K., Mitra, S., & Qureshi, I. (2019). Adopting bricolage to overcome resource constraints: The case of social enterprises in rural India. Management and Organization Review, 15(2), 371-402. (In Persian) [DOI:10.1017/mor.2019.19]
39. Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(1), 19-46. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x]
40. Kang, X., Zhao, Y., & Wang, L. (2023). The Influence of Entrepreneurial Bricolage on Opportunity Recognition for New Ventures Based on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Information Systems Engineering, 8(4), 112-128. [DOI:10.55267/iadt.07.13782]
41. Khosravi, E., Gholamrezaee, S., Rahimian, M., & Akbari, M. (2016). Analysis of the effective factors in development of organizational entrepreneurship in cooperatives, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 3 (4), 89-101. (In Persian)
42. Kickul, J., Griffiths, M., Bacq, S., & Garud, N. (2018). Catalyzing social innovation: is entrepreneurial bricolage always good? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 407-420. [DOI:10.1080/08985626.2017.1413771]
43. Kirzner, I. M. )1973(. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245-253. [DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9630-8]
45. Lepistö, T., Mäkitalo-Keinonen, T., & Valjakka, T. (2019). Opportunity recognition in a hub-governed network-insights from garage services. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 257-280. [DOI:10.1007/s11365-017-0439-6]
46. Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966. The savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Lumpkin, G. T., & B. B. Lichtenstein, B. B. (2005). The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 451-472. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x]
48. Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2005). The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(4), 451-472. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x]
49. Moghimi, S. M; Vakili, U., Akbari, M., (2019). Theories of Entrepreneurship (6 Ed). University of Tehran Press. (In Persian).
50. Moghtader Kargaran, J. (2025). Identifying and evaluating the impact of role-enabling components on organizational green innovation behavior. Library and Information Studies, 36(3), 224-240.
51. Montezeri, M., Pasandi, N., & Alirezaei, A. (2016). Investigating the effect of social capital on organizational entrepreneurship (Case study: small and medium -size businesses). Social Capital Management, 3(4), 583-605. (In Persian)
52. Nasr Isfahani, A., Ansari, R., & Molaee Khorasqani, R. (2016). Investigating the effect of absorptive capacity's knowledge on corporate entrepreneurship (Case of Isfahan Science & Technology Town). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 9(2), 377-395. (In Persian)
53. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. [DOI:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879] [PMID]
54. Rahimiaghdam, S. (2021). The impact of top management support on organizational entrepreneurship: The mediating role of affective commitment among faculty members of Tabriz University. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 51(1), 41-60.
55. Rahimiaghdam, S., Babazadeh, R., & Shamsi, M. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between competency-based factors of competitive advantages: A case of the insurance industry. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 22(4), 306-324. [DOI:10.1504/IJTPM.2022.126138]
56. Rahimiaghdam, S., Sanoubar, N., & Ahmadian, A. (2023). Investigating the effect of strategic agility on SMEs international success with the mediating role of network-oriented growth. Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 177-194.
57. Rahimiaghdam, S., Sanoubar, N., & Ahmadian, A. (2023). The impact of strategic agility on the international success of small and medium-sized enterprises: The mediating role of network-oriented growth. Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 177-194.
58. Renko, M., Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (2012). Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: a general framework. Management Decision, 50(7), 1233-1251. [DOI:10.1108/00251741211246987]
59. Rezaei, R., Badsar, M., & Amin Fenck, D. (2017). Effect of entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance in Jihad-e Agriculture Organization of West Azarbaijan Province, Iranian Jornal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47 (4), 865-877. (In Persian).
60. Rezaian, Ali, (2022), Fundamentals of Organization and Management, Tehran, Semat Publications, 23rd edition (In Persian).
61. Rizvandi, M., Rahnavard, F., & Sakhdari, K. (2021). Developing an entrepreneurial model for mega and big cities in Iran. Journal of Management and Development Process (JMDP), 34(2), 3-28. (In Persian). [DOI:10.52547/jmdp.34.2.3]
62. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
63. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday
64. Sengura, J. D., & Renyan, M. (2024). The role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage on frugal innovation and SMEs' sustainable performance in emerging markets. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 10(4), 19-37. [DOI:10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.104.1005]
65. Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource‐constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230. [DOI:10.1111/jpim.12091]
66. Shane, S., Nicolaou, N., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. D. (2010). Do openness to experience and recognizing opportunities have the same genetic source? Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 49(2), 291-303. [DOI:10.1002/hrm.20343]
67. Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). The concept of "opportunity" in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of management, 36(1), 40-65. [DOI:10.1177/0149206309342746]
68. Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305-318. [DOI:10.1177/0092070397254003] [PMCID]
69. Steffens, P. R., Baker, T., Davidsson, P., & Senyard, J. M. (2023). When is less more? Boundary conditions of effective entrepreneurial bricolage. Journal of Management, 49(4), 1277-1311. [DOI:10.1177/01492063221077210]
70. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005]
71. Tseng, C., & Tseng, C. C. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship as a strategic approach for internal innovation performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 108-120. [DOI:10.1108/APJIE-08-2018-0047]
72. Tsilika, T., Kakouris, A., Apostolopoulos, N., & Dermatis, Z. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage in the aftermath of a shock. Insights from Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(6), 635-652. [DOI:10.1080/08276331.2020.1764733]
73. Tsilika, T., Kakouris, A., Apostolopoulos, N., & Dermatis, Z. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage in the aftermath of a shock: Insights from Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(6), 635-652. [DOI:10.1080/08276331.2020.1764733]
74. Urbano, D., Turro, A., Wright, M., & Zahra, S. (2022). Corporate entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Small Business Economics, 1-25. [DOI:10.1007/s11187-021-00590-6]
75. Wetzels, M., Odekerken‐Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. [DOI:10.2307/20650284]
76. Wu, L., Liu, H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity: The moderating role of technological turbulence. Journal of Business Research, 70, 127-135. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.027]
77. Yi, Y., Li, Y., Hitt, M. A., Liu, Y., & Wei, Z. (2016). The influence of resource bundling on the speed of strategic change: Moderating effects of relational capital. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 435-467. [DOI:10.1007/s10490-016-9458-z]
78. Zahra, S. A. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship as knowledge creation and conversion: The role of entrepreneurial hubs. Small Business Economics, 44(4), 727-735. [DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9650-4]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
- کاربران حاضر در وبگاه: 1 کاربر;
- میهمانان در حال بازدید: 110 کاربر;
- تمام بازدیدها: 25266804 بازدید;
- بازدید 24 ساعت قبل: 16095 بازدید
