Volume 38, Issue 3 (Autumn 2025)
JMDP 2025, 38(3): 36-93 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jahangiri A, Zandi Ravan N. (2025). The Role and Position of Think Tanks as Policy Actors. JMDP. 38(3), 36-93.
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4808-en.html
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4808-en.html
1- Department of Public Administration, Institute for Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran.
2- Director of Library and Reference Sources, Institute for Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran. ,zandiravan@gmail.com
2- Director of Library and Reference Sources, Institute for Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran. ,
Abstract: (375 Views)
Purpose: Think thanks grew dramatically in the twentieth century with the rise of democracies and the increasing complexity of governments. In Iran, more than one hundred think tanks appeared before and after the revolution. While overseas think tanks have been pioneers in policymaking for the development and maintenance of sustainability in their communities, they have guided governments and their countries in economic, social, political, and cultural spheres. However, the Iranian think tanks have not been able to play the role of pioneers in these spheres towards policymaking and development.
Methodology: Although the nature of this comparative study was descriptive and analytical, it aimed to discover relationships among concepts and to understand similarities and disparities. The approach was intra-case analysis. We performed this comparative study on a sample of twenty-four think tanks selected from among the think tanks of developed and developing countries dispersed all over the continents.
Findings: Iranian think tanks are far behind those of overseas in terms of mission and goals, organizational structure and development, diversification of financial resources, expert and supportive manpower context, outputs related to policymaking, multiplicity of research and subject areas, reflection of activities and findings in mass media and social media, dissemination and distribution of scientific and promotional resources, developing skills and university education, participation in scientific networks, decision-making and policymaking.
Originality: Considering such elements as quantitative method, number of variables studied, and geographic dispersion of statistical population, this study is more valuable compared to similar research.
Methodology: Although the nature of this comparative study was descriptive and analytical, it aimed to discover relationships among concepts and to understand similarities and disparities. The approach was intra-case analysis. We performed this comparative study on a sample of twenty-four think tanks selected from among the think tanks of developed and developing countries dispersed all over the continents.
Findings: Iranian think tanks are far behind those of overseas in terms of mission and goals, organizational structure and development, diversification of financial resources, expert and supportive manpower context, outputs related to policymaking, multiplicity of research and subject areas, reflection of activities and findings in mass media and social media, dissemination and distribution of scientific and promotional resources, developing skills and university education, participation in scientific networks, decision-making and policymaking.
Originality: Considering such elements as quantitative method, number of variables studied, and geographic dispersion of statistical population, this study is more valuable compared to similar research.
Type of Study: Case-Study |
Subject:
Administrative structures
Received: Nov 27 2024 | Accepted: Jul 22 2025 | ePublished: Jan 26 2026
Received: Nov 27 2024 | Accepted: Jul 22 2025 | ePublished: Jan 26 2026
References
1. Abb, P., Zhu, X., & Kollner, P. (2018). Understanding the development of think tanks in mqINLnd China, Taiwan, Japan.
2. Alvani, M., & Vaezi, R. (2013). An introduction to management studies. Journal of Improvement and Transformation Management Studies, 3(5). (in Persian)
3. Ansari, Reza, Sultanzadeh, Javad (2013). A Comparative Study of Select Research and Technology Organizations and Some Lessons for Iran, 21(Spring), 173-205. (in Persian)
4. Ashrafi, Mojtaba, Ashrafi, Morteza (2024). The strategic role of think tanks in promoting public diplomacy and strengthening Iran's scientific and cultural capacities in the horizon of 1414. Journal of Research in History, Politics and Media, 7( 25), 19-48. (in Persian)
5. Bajenova, T. (2023). Transnational think tank networks: multipliers of political power or a new from of expertise monopolies at the European level. Administrative theory & praxis, 45(2), 100-126. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2124746]]
6. Baloue, S., Moore, C., & Mc Gann, J. (2013). 2013 European think tank summit Report. Pensylvannia: University of Pensylvannia.
7. Banerjee, A., Kumar, V., Nidhi, M., & Sabbharwal, S. (2015). Exploring effectiveness and impact think tank university relationship in south asia.
8. Bangladesh Institute of Development. (2020). Retrieved from Bangladesh Institute of Development: [https://www.bids.org.bd]
9. Blackstone, T., & Plowden, W. (1988). Inside the Think Tank: Advising the Cabinet 1971-1983. Arrow (A Division of Random House Group).
10. Boucher, S. (2006). Europe and its think tanks: a promis to be fulfilled. Notre Europe: Notre Europe.
11. Center for Public Policy Studies. (2020). Retrieved from Center for Public Policy Studies: [www.cpps.org.my]
12. Clark, J., & Roodman, D. (2013). Measuring think tank performance. Center for global development.
13. Della Porta, D. (2013). Can Democracy Be Saved?: Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm065]
14. Denham, A., Stone, D., & Garnett, M. (1998). Think tanks across nations: a comparative approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
15. Economic Policy Research Centre. (2020). Retrieved from Economic Policy Research Centre: [https://eprcug.org/about-eprc/strategic-plan]
16. Emam Jom'ehzadeh, J., & Babaei, M. (2015). The role of think tanks in U.S. foreign policy decision-making regarding Iran's nuclear case. International Relations Research Journal, 115-143. (in Persian)
17. Economic Policy Research Centre. (2020). Retrieved from Economic Policy Research Centre: [https://eprcug.org/about-eprc]
18. European Center for Development Policy Management. (2020). Retrieved from European Center for Development Policy Management: [https://ecdpm.org]
19. Farussen, B., & Halpin, D. (2016). Think Tanks and Strategic Policy Making. New York: Policy Science.
20. Grace, A., & Una, G. (2010). Think thanks and public polices in Latin America. Argentina.
21. Gupta, J., & Sushil, S. (2004). Creating knowledg based organization. Hershey: Idea group publishing, Ball State University. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-162-9] [https://openaccess.mpg.de/2365/en] [https://www.mpg.de/short-portrait]
22. Imai, A. (2013). The evolving role of think tanks in Japan. Japan Spotlith, Pilots in the chartless sea of a Knowledge economy.
23. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development. (2020). Retrieved from Indira Gandhi Institute of Development: [http://www.igidr.ac.in]
24. Institute for Public Policy Research. (2020). Retrieved from Institute for Public Policy Research: [https://www.ippr.org]
25. Institute for Public Policy Research. (2020). Retrieved from Institute for Public Policy Research: [https://onthinktanks.org/think-tank/institute-for-public-policy-research-2/]
26. Institute for Research on Public Policy. (2020). Retrieved from Institute for Research on Public Policy: [https://irpp.org/research/income-inequality-the-canadian-story/]
27. Institute for Research on Public Policy. (2020). Retrieved from Institute for Research on Public Policy: [http://irpp.org/]
28. Insurance and Financial Practitioners Association of Singapore. (2020). Retrieved from Insurance and Financial Practitioners Association of Singapore: [https://www.ifpas.org.sg/professional-development-overview.html]
29. Insurance and Financial Practitioners Association of Singapore. (2020). Retrieved from Insurance and Financial Practitioners Association of Singapore: [https://www.linkedin.com/company/ifpas/about]
30. International Development Research Centre . (2020). Retrieved from International Development Research Centre : [https://www.idrc.ca/en]
31. International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2020). Retrieved from International Institute for Sustainable Development: [https://www.iisd.org]
32. Jafari Moghaddam, S. (2002). The process of knowledge management: From organizational learning to organizational memory. Management and Development, 3(12), 79-95. (in Persian)
33. Japan Development Institute. (2020). Retrieved from Japan Development Institute: [www.jditokyo.com]
34. Karimi, E., Soltani, E (2021) Pathology of the role of think tanks in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic. Journal of Political science Association. 16(1), 137- 163. (in Persian)
35. Kollner, P. (2016). understanding the development of Think Tanks in main land China, Taiwan, Japan. [https://doi.org/10.5509/20189115]
36. Korea Development Institute . (2020). Retrieved from Korea Development Institute : [https://www.kdevelopedia.org/]
37. Korea Development Institute. (2020). Retrieved from Korea Development Institute : [http://www.kdi.re.kr/kdi_eng/about/ad_history.jsp]
38. Korea Development Institute. (2020). Retrieved from Korea Development Institute : [https://www.kdevelopedia.org/themeSub.do?themeSubId=06201903040151270]
39. Ladi, S. (1999). Globalization, think tanks and policy transfer. World Bank Conference of global development network. Germany, Bonn: World Bank.
40. Mc Gann, J. (2018). New business models for think tank.
41. Mc Gann, J. (2016). Report on tap think tank, in Asia by country. Pensylvannia: University of Pensylvannia.
42. Mc Gann, J. (2020). 2019 Global go to think tank index report. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
43. Mc Gann, J. G. (2005). Think tanks and Policy Advice in the US. Foreign policy research institute.
44. McGann, J. (2021). 2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program . Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from: [https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/18]
45. Moshtaghi Nia, Ghollam Hossein (2021). Capacity Building of Strategic Think Tanks in the Management of Iran's Identity Issues, National Studies. 22 (2), 49-67 (in Persian)
46. Najjari, Reza, Madani, Javad (2018). A comparative study of the structure and function of Payame Noor University with five open universities in the world, Quarterly Journal of Management of Governmental Organizations, 7 (1), 89 - 110 (in Persian)
47. Pautz, H. (2011). Revisiting the think tank phenomen. Public administration committee, 26(4), 419-435. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076710378328]
48. Portes, R., & Yeo, S. (2001). Think-net: the CEPR model of a research network. CEPR.
49. Rahat, H. (2010). From policy research to politicak advocacy: differentiating think tank from pressure group in americam politics. Indian quarterly: a journak of international affairs, 66(287). [https://doi.org/10.1177/097492841006600304]
50. RAND Corporation . (2020). Retrieved from RAND Corporation: [https://www.rand.org/about.html]
51. Schlesinger, P. (2009). Creativity and expert new labour, think tank and the pokicy process. International journal of press/politics, 14(1), 3-20. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208328898]
52. Shambaugh, D. (2002). Chain's international relations think tanks: evaluating structure and process. Beijing: CICIR. Retrieved from: [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009443902000360] [http://www.cicir.ac.cn/NEW/en-us/aboutus.html]
53. Shieh, H., & Ching, Y. (2005). Strategy between KM, HRM and corporate development. International journal of manpower, 26(6), 583-584. [DOI:10.1108/01437720510625476]
54. Society of Think Tanks. (2021). List of think tanks. Retrieved from [https://iranthinktanks.com/tt]
55. Stone, D., & Class, F. (1996). capturing the political imagination. London.
56. Thailand Development Research Institute. (2020). Retrieved from Thailand Development Research Institute: [https://tdri.or.th]
57. The Frontier Centre for Public Policy. (2020). Retrieved from The Frontier Centre for Public Policy: [https://fcpp.org/about/]
58. The Frontier Centre for Public Policy. (2020). Retrieved from The Frontier Centre for Public Policy: [http://www.fcpp.org/files/annual-reports/pdfs/annual-report-2012.pdf]
59. The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2020). Retrieved from The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry: [https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/about/index.html]
60. Zhu, X. (2011). Roles of ThinkTanks in China.
61. Zolfagharzadeh, Mohammad Mahdi, Karimian, Zohre (2017). Typology of functions of academic centers and advisory institutions in public policy making: a comprehensive and integrated model. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 3(1), 83 -112. (in Persian)
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
