Volume 33, Issue 1 (Spring 2020)
JMDP 2020, 33(1): 27-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahnavard F. (2020). Organizational Black Hole Theory. JMDP. 33(1), 27-56. doi:10.29252/jmdp.33.1.27
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3885-en.html
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3885-en.html
Department of Management, Institute for Management and Planning Studies, Tehran, Iran. , frahnavard@imps.ac.ir
Abstract: (6538 Views)
There are issues in organizations that require new theoretical formulation. Hence, metaphorical theorizing is used in the study of organizations to interpret them and understand their complexities. In this method, the organization is likened to an entity and one of the key features of that entity is generalized to the organization. It should be borne in mind that most organizational theories are based on a positivist paradigm that focuses on knowledge and data in an attempt to discover the nomothetic of social systems. This article is an attempt to build a theory based on interpretive paradigm that puts the organizational black hole theory forward in a metaphorical way. The black hole theory of the organization has been adopted from the cosmic black hole metaphor. In the first step, the key features of the organizational black hole were summarized in accordance with the researcher's interpretation, taking into account the one-on-one correspondence and adopting the cosmic black hole characteristics. In the second step, the definition of the organizational black hole was presented based on key features, and in the third step the overall framework of the theory was formulated. In addition, by analyzing the characteristics of the organizational black hole theory, it was found that this theory falls under the interpretative paradigm. Finally, how one can test the theory in terms of falsifiability or utility is discussed.
Keywords: Organizational Black Hole, Theory Building, Metaphor, Positivist Paradigm, Interpretive Paradigm.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Public Administration
Received: Apr 17 2020 | Accepted: Aug 25 2020 | ePublished: Oct 13 2020
Received: Apr 17 2020 | Accepted: Aug 25 2020 | ePublished: Oct 13 2020
References
1. Babbie, E. R. (1998). The Practice of Social Research.International Thomson Publishing Services.
2. Berg, B. L. (2001). Quantitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences.Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bierstedt, R. (1959). Nominal and Real Definitions in Sociological Theory. In L. Gross (Ed.). Symposium on Sociological Theory, New York: Harper & Row: 121-144.
4. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis Heinemann. London: UK.
5. Cox III, J., & Schleier, J. (2010). Theory of Constraints Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
6. Ferrarese, L., Colpi, M., Gorini, V., Haardt, F., & Moschella, U. (2006). Joint Evolution of Black Holes and Galaxies. Taylor & Francis.
7. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State Building: Governance and World Order in 21st Century. Cornell University Press.
8. Gardner, T. (2011). The Bermuda Triangle of Organizational Change. Retrieved from thehrintrovert.com/2011/03/the-bermuda-triangle-of-organizational-change/Goldratt, E. (2010). 1-Introduction to TOC-My Perspective. McGraw Hill Professional.
9. Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and Practice. Trans. J. Viertel, London. Heinemann.
10. Hagan, F. E. (1997). Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology.Allyn and Bacon Boston.
11. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation: And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Free Press.
12. Hubbard, R., & Paquet, G. (2010). The Black Hole of Public Administration.University of Ottawa Press.
13. Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Research. Scranton, PA: Chandler Publication.
14. Kerlinger, F., & Lee, H. (1986). Observations of Behavior and Sociometry. Foundations of Behavioral Research. 3rd Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 486-493.
15. Kiel, L. D., & Elliott, E. W. (1996). Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications. University of Michigan Press. [DOI:10.3998/mpub.14623]
16. Kieżun, W., & Bielecki, C. (2012). Patologia Transformacji. Wydawnictwo Poltext.
17. Kompella, R. R., Yates, J., Greenberg, A., & Snoeren, A. C. (2007). Detection and Localization of Network Black Holes. Paper Presented at the IEEE INFOCOM 2007-26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. [DOI:10.1109/INFCOM.2007.252]
18. Krasner, S. (1990). The Ubiquity of Chaos. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
19. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: University of Chicago. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001]
20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (Vol. 640). Basic books New York.
21. Lewis, R. D. (2003). The Cultural Imperative: Global Trends in the 21st Century. Intercultural Press Yarmouth, ME.
22. Lutka, R. (2008). Black Holes in Accounting. Black Holes-Areas of Undesirable Activities That Go Unchecked. CMA Management, 82(2), 24.
23. Lutka, R. (2014). Black Holes in Organizations. Define Dissect Diffuse: iUniverse Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. Sage Publication.
24. Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World.
25. Nardo, D. (2004). Black Holes: Lucent Books.
26. Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional Rational Choice. An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, in Sabatier, P.A., and Weible, C.M. (Eds.) Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd Edition, Colorado: Westview Press.
27. Popper, K. R. (1968). Kant's Critique and Cosmology'in Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Harper and Row.
28. Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic Metaphor Analysis as a Method of Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358-394.
29. Shaughnessy, J., Zechmeister, E., & Zechmeister, J. (2012). Observation. Research Methods in Psychology (9th ed.), Ed JJ Shaughnessy, E. B. and J. S Zechmeister (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies), 92-136.
30. Sroka, W., & Cygler, J. (2014). Pathologies in Inter-Organizational Networks. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12(1), 626-635. [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00387-6]
31. Tull, R. G., Tull, D., Hester, S., & Johnson, A. (2016). Dark Matters: Metaphorical Black Holes That Affect Ethnic Underrepresentation in Engineering. Paper Presented at the 126th ASEE Conference. [DOI:10.18260/p.26636]
32. Vasquez, J. A. (1998). The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511491733]
33. Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. McGraw-Hill.
34. Yasin, A., & Abu Zant, M. (2018). Detecting and Isolating Black-Hole Attacksin MANET Using Timer Based Baited Technique. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, (1)1, 1-10. [DOI:10.1155/2018/9812135]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
