Volume 32, Issue 3 (autumn 2019)                   JMDP 2019, 32(3): 49-70 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jokar B, Alipour Darvish Z, Yazdani H R, Mirsepasi N. Human Resources Dignity Foresighting in Government Organizations: A Case Study. JMDP 2019; 32 (3) :49-70
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3562-en.html
Human Resources Dignity Foresighting in Government Organizations: A Case Study
Babak Jokar 1, Zahra Alipour Darvish2 , Hamid Reza Yazdani3 , Naser Mirsepasi2
1- Tehran Province Civil Registration , b_jokar@iau-tnb.ac.ir
2- Azad University
3- Tehran University
Abstract:   (5009 Views)

Dignity is one of the new and influential concepts that come about in the field of human resources (especially the future of human resources), therefore, organizations should consider it from now. In the field of human resource research, rarely addressed the issue of human dignity and respect for employees. This research looks at factors that can make future changes to the dignity of human resources in the organization. Research method is exploratory & explanatory. Sampling is targeted and snowballed. The research community is 14 experts of the organization. In this way, the depth of the raw data with open, selective, and theoretical coding reveals the results. With open coding 148 items founded, At the theoretical coding stage, these factors are extracted: Internet and social network deployment, the use of smart chips in human resource management, cyber security, the creation of virtual organizations and teamwork, the transformation of values over time and differences in the definition of respect between different generations, ethics in management, Privacy, individual contexts, organizational and social contexts. They are summarized in the selective coding stage of the three force driver: information technology, ethics, and the platforms necessary to maintain dignity. By using these force drivers can imagine different scenarios for the future of human resource dignity of the organization. Managers and employees can use these scenarios to implement the future of human resource dignity of the organization in such a way as to benefit the organization and employees, so that the organization achieves the desired results, as well as employees have respect and dignity.

Keywords: Foresight, Dignity, Human Resources, Scenario, Case Study
Full-Text [PDF 733 kb]   (1440 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Public Administration
Received: May 25 2019 | Accepted: Jan 26 2020 | ePublished: Jun 02 2020
References
1. Al arsis, A., & Sidany, y. (2016). Comparative international human resource management: Future research directions. H.R.M review Humres-00545, 2-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.04.007]
2. Barclay, L. (2016). In sickness and indignity: a philosophical account of the meaning of dignity in healthcare. International journal of nursing studies No.61, 136. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.06.010]
3. Blagaa, P., & Jozsef, B. (2014). Human resources, quality circles and innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance No.15, 1458-1460. [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00611-X]
4. Buttarelli, G. (2015). To ward anewdigital ethics: data, dignity and technology. Europian data protection supervisor .
5. Chadwick, A. (2012). A dignified approach to improving the patient experience: Promoting privacy, dignity and respect through collaborative training. Nurse Education in Practice No.12, 187-191. [DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2011.12.006]
6. Clarke , N., & Mahadi, N. (2017). The significance of mutual recognition respect in mediating the relationships between trait emotional intelligence, affective commitment and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences No.115, 129-134. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.028]
7. Cleaveland, J. N., Byrne, Z., & Cavanage, T. (2015). The future of HR is RH: respect for humanity at work. H.R.M review No.25, 149-151. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.005]
8. Cohen, M. D. (2011). A concept of dignity. Berkelly law Schollarship Repository, 11-16.
9. Crossley , C. (2009). Emotional and behavioral reactions to social undermining: A closer look at perceived offender motives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes No.109, 21. [DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.001]
10. Daniels, S. R., Wang, G., Lawong, D., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). Collective assessment of H.R.M field meta analytic needs and theory development prespects for the futher. Human resource management review No.27, 5. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.002]
11. Grassi, L., Costantini, A., Brunetti, S., Marchetti, P., Cruso, R., Saboto, S., & Nanni, M. G. (2016). Dignity and Psychosocial-related Variables in Advanced and Nonadvanced Canserpatient. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 3.
12. Hall, j., & Mitchel, m. (2015). Dignity and Respect in Midwifery Education in the UK: A Survey of Lead Midwives of Education. Nurse Education in Practice No.21, 9-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.09.003]
13. Hall, J., & Mitchel, M. (2015). Dignity and respect in midwifery education in the UK: A survey of Lead Midwives of Education. Nurse Education in Practice No.21, 9-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.09.003]
14. Hesslin, V. L. (2015). An Analyse of the Concept Dignity. Accident and Emergency Nursing No.13, 252-255.
15. Koys, D. (1988). Human Resource Management and a Culture of Respect: Effects on Employees' Organizational Commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 57-68. [DOI:10.1007/BF01385453]
16. Liebl, F., & Schwarz, J. (2010). Normality of the Future: Trend Diagnosis for Strategic Foresight. Futures, 313-327. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.017]
17. Lin, H.-F., Su, J.-Q., & Higgins, A. (2015). How Dynamic Capabilities Affect Adoption of Management Innovations. Journal of Business Research GBR-008472, 5.
18. Marler, j. H., & Fisher, s. L. (2013). An Evidence Based Review of e-HRM and Strategic H.R.M. H.R.M Review No.23, 19. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.06.002]
19. Matiti, M., & Trorey, G. (2004). Perceptual Adjustment Levels: Patients' Perception of their Dignity in the Hospital Setting. International Journal of Nursing Studies No.41, 736. [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7489(04)00039-2]
20. Matthews, E. (2016). Respect for Personhood in Medical and Psychiatric Ethics. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health JEMEP-167, 1-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jemep.2016.10.007]
21. Perles, G. M., & Martin, A. E. (2017). To Wards a Substantive Knowledge that Promotes the Dignity of the Human Being. Journal of Innovention & Knowledge No.42, 1-7.
22. Rhisiart, M., Störmer, E., & Daheimc, C. (2016). From Foresight to Impact? The 2030 Future of Work Scenarios. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 1-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.020]
23. Richter, P., & Bruhl, R. (2016). Shared Service Center Research: A Review of the Past, Present,and Future. European Management Journal, 1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.004]
24. Roger, K., & Ashforth, B. (2014). Respect in Organizations: Feeling Valued as "We" and "Me". Sage Journal; Journal of management V.43, 1578-1608. [DOI:10.1177/0149206314557159]
25. Ryan, A., & Wessel, J. (2015). Implications of a Changing Workforce and Workplace for Justice Perceptions and Expectations. H.R.M Review No.498, 14. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.001]
26. Schalk, r., Timmerman, v., & Van den heuvel, s. (2013). How Strategic Considerations Influence Decision Making on e-HRM Applications. H.R.M Review No.23, 85. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.06.008]
27. Song, A. (2015). Human Diginity: a Fundamental Guiding Valu for Human Rights Approach to Fishiers? Marine Policy No.61, 165-167. [DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.013]
29. Stone, D. l., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., Johnson, R., ., & . (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. H.R.M review 25, 216-231. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002]
30. Ulrich, d., & Dulebohn, j. (2015). Are we there yet? What's next for HR? H.R.M review No.25 , 188-190. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.004]
31. Van der Heijden, K. (2011). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. Chinchester: Jhon Wiley & Sons.
32. Van Gennip, I. E., Pasman, H. R., Vlug, M. G., Willems, D. L., & Philipsen, B. D. (2013). The development of a model of dignity in illness based on qualitative interviews with seriously ill patients. International Journal of Nursing Studies No.50, 1080-1089. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.014]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Management and Development Process

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb