Ready for publish
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
1- institute for humanities and social studies , Shahbazi@acecr.ac.ir
2- institute for humanities and social studies
2- institute for humanities and social studies
Abstract: (20 Views)
Purpose: This study aims to identify and comparatively analyze the approaches and tools used to assess administrative integrity in leading global models, in order to extract international lessons learned and propose a framework for enhancing administrative integrity in countries with institutional structures similar to Iran.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This qualitative study is based on a systematic review of the literature. Data were collected and analyzed using Sandelowski and Barroso’s seven-step framework. The study population consisted of international documents and operational models developed by Transparency International, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Data analysis was conducted through qualitative content analysis, and interpretive validity was ensured through three-stage coding and researcher consensus.
Findings: The findings indicate that global models for assessing administrative integrity are mainly presented in two formats: national integrity systems and perception-based surveys. Transparency International’s perception-based indicators are suitable for international comparison but require supplementation with objective national data. UNDP’s approach emphasizes staff participation and incremental reform, while the OECD’s maturity models provide the most comprehensive institutional framework. Critical analysis shows that applying global models without contextual adaptation faces challenges such as weak institutional coordination and limited data transparency. Accordingly, the proposed hybrid model integrates perception–objective monitoring, strengthening of organizational culture, and evidence-based
Design/Methodology/Approach: This qualitative study is based on a systematic review of the literature. Data were collected and analyzed using Sandelowski and Barroso’s seven-step framework. The study population consisted of international documents and operational models developed by Transparency International, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Data analysis was conducted through qualitative content analysis, and interpretive validity was ensured through three-stage coding and researcher consensus.
Findings: The findings indicate that global models for assessing administrative integrity are mainly presented in two formats: national integrity systems and perception-based surveys. Transparency International’s perception-based indicators are suitable for international comparison but require supplementation with objective national data. UNDP’s approach emphasizes staff participation and incremental reform, while the OECD’s maturity models provide the most comprehensive institutional framework. Critical analysis shows that applying global models without contextual adaptation faces challenges such as weak institutional coordination and limited data transparency. Accordingly, the proposed hybrid model integrates perception–objective monitoring, strengthening of organizational culture, and evidence-based
Keywords: Administrative Integrity, National Integrity System, Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Policy
Type of Study: Review Article |
Subject:
Ethics & Administrative Integrity
Received: Jul 14 2025 | Accepted: Sep 28 2025
Received: Jul 14 2025 | Accepted: Sep 28 2025
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
