Volume 35, Issue 3 (Autumn 2022)
JMDP 2022, 35(3): 99-127 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahnavard R. (2022). Theoretical basis of administrative development aligned with upstream documents in Iran. JMDP. 35(3), 99-127. doi:10.52547/jmdp.35.3.99
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4513-en.html
URL: http://jmdp.ir/article-1-4513-en.html
Executive Management, Water and Sewage Company, Fourth District of Tehran, Iran. , reliable_r_ramin@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1457 Views)
Purpose: The present research, intends to formulate and propose a theoretical basis of administrative development for the Seventh Development Plan, along with the upstream documents.
Methodology: This research was of evaluation type and attempted to use the evaluation process method to formulate a theoretical basis of administrative development with an emphasis on the Seventh Development Plan.
Findings: The results of the research show that there is no dependable theoretical basis for developing program rules in the field of administrative reform. Therefore, by identifying different theoretical views in the field of administrative reform and by selecting appropriate criteria in the light of upstream documents, both the evaluated theories of administrative development and the view of transcendental values management are proposed as a suitable theoretical basis for administrative development.
Originality: Studies have been conducted to select a theoretical basis for administrative development in Iran with an approach of Islamic governance. This study was able to propose a defensible theoretical basis for formulating program rules in the field of administrative development for the Seventh Development Plan in Iran by focusing on the evaluation methodology of theoretical views.
Methodology: This research was of evaluation type and attempted to use the evaluation process method to formulate a theoretical basis of administrative development with an emphasis on the Seventh Development Plan.
Findings: The results of the research show that there is no dependable theoretical basis for developing program rules in the field of administrative reform. Therefore, by identifying different theoretical views in the field of administrative reform and by selecting appropriate criteria in the light of upstream documents, both the evaluated theories of administrative development and the view of transcendental values management are proposed as a suitable theoretical basis for administrative development.
Originality: Studies have been conducted to select a theoretical basis for administrative development in Iran with an approach of Islamic governance. This study was able to propose a defensible theoretical basis for formulating program rules in the field of administrative development for the Seventh Development Plan in Iran by focusing on the evaluation methodology of theoretical views.
Keywords: Development, Theoretical Basis, Administrative Reform, Development Administration, Mega Policies.
Type of Study: Viewpoint |
Received: Aug 07 2022 | Accepted: Nov 27 2022 | ePublished: Mar 13 2023
Received: Aug 07 2022 | Accepted: Nov 27 2022 | ePublished: Mar 13 2023
References
1. Ackoff, R. L. (1998). A Systemic View of Transformational Leadership. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 23-36. [DOI:10.1023/A:1022960804854]
2. Allmendinger, P. (2017). Planning Theory: Palgrave. [DOI:10.1057/978-0-230-38004-2]
3. Balogh, B. (2015). The Associational State: American Governance in the Twentieth Century: University of Pennsylvania Press. [DOI:10.9783/9780812291377]
4. Buckley, J., Archibald, T., Hargraves, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2015). Defining and Teaching Evaluative Thinking: Insights from Research on Critical Thinking. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(3), 375-388. [DOI:10.1177/1098214015581706]
5. Chimhowu, A. O., Hulme, D., & Munro, L. T. (2019). The 'New'national Development Planning and Global Development Goals: Processes and Partnerships. World Development, 120(1), 76-89. [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013]
6. Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559. [DOI:10.1111/0033-3352.00117]
7. Dong, L. (2015). New Public Administration: Awakening of Value Rationality. In Public Administration Theories: Instrumental and Value Rationalities (pp. 157-185): Springer. [DOI:10.1057/9781137536426_7]
8. Friedman, H. J. (1966). Five Articles on Development Administration in Pakistan: Michigan State University.
9. Golembiewski, R. (1977). Public Administration as a Developing Discipline: Marcel Dekver.
10. Gongrong, T. (2008). Schools of Thoughts of Public Administration in the West: Peking University Press.
11. Goulet, D. (1992). Development: Creator and Destroyer of Values. World Development, 20(3), 467-475. [DOI:10.1016/0305-750X(92)90036-U]
12. Harrison, D. (1988). The Sociology of Modernization and Development: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203359587]
13. Harriss, J. (2002). Depoliticizing Development: The World Bank and Social Capital: Anthem Press.
14. Heady, F. (2001). Public Administration, A Comparative Perspective: CRC Press. [DOI:10.4324/9781420029482]
15. Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical Theory: Selected Essays: A&C Black.
16. Hughes, O. (2004). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction: China Renmin University Press, Beijing.
17. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy: Routledge.
18. Johnston, B., & Clark, W. (1982). Organization Programs: Institutional Structures and Managerial Procedures. Redesigning Rural Development: A Strategic Perspective: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Kaehler, B., & Grundei, J. (2018). HR Governance: A Theoretical Introduction: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-94526-2]
20. Koontz, H. (1961). The Management Theory Jungle. Academy of Management Journal, 4(3), 174-188. [DOI:10.2307/254541]
21. Mittelman, J. H. (2000). Globalization: Captors and Captive. Third World Quarterly, 21(6), 917-929. [DOI:10.1080/01436590020011945]
22. Moore, M. (1995). Promoting Good Government by Supporting Institutional Development? IDS Bulletin, 26(2), 89-96. [DOI:10.1111/j.1759-5436.1995.mp26002010.x]
23. Ostrom, V. (2008). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration: University of Alabama Press.
24. Rahnavard, F. (2010). Fact and Fiction in Good Governance Model. Management and Development Process, 22(3), 46-67. [http://jmdp.ir/article-1-2316-fa.html]
25. Ramos, A. G. (1976). Theory of Social Systems Delimitation: A Preliminary Statement. Administration & Society, 8(2), 249-272. [DOI:10.1177/009539977600800208]
26. Vasquez, J. A. (1998). The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511491733]
27. Wagner, J. M. (2015). Acceptance of Corporate Governance in Germany and Austria. GAZDASÁG ÉS TÁRSADALOM, 2015(4), 53-65. [DOI:10.21637/GT.2015.4.04.]
28. Waterston, A. (1965). Development Planning: Lessons of Experience (Vol. 6): Johns Hopkins Press Baltimore.
29. Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222. [DOI:10.2307/2139277]
30. Yousefzadeh, H. (2019). Basics of Kosari Progress in the Thought of Allameh Javadi Amoli. Isra Hikmat, 11(1), 29-58. [http://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_119796.html?lang=en]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
